I recently received a violation notice stating that I installed an exterior door camera without prior approval.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rB0ShvK3GZbSCNFgp8Vnr2aJgssu0VBe/view?usp=drive_link
đź“· The Issue
👉 The photograph referenced in the violation does not appear to be my unit door.
There are clear differences in the door, hardware, and surrounding features when compared to my actual unit.
🔍 My Setup
- Ring doorbell at my unit
- Mounted using non-permanent means
- No drilling or structural modification
🧾 My Response
I formally responded, provided photos of my actual door, and requested all records used to issue the violation:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XOd1bP1RcaC4tWBWI5BbDMYtpICiNS9G/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v71Q-UU57u5BnGN_4KylVW47FmfyKaD6/view?usp=drive_link
⚠️ Additional Concern
The ticket associated with this request was marked as closed while I am still awaiting a response and supporting documentation.
🧠Status
- Violation received
- Response submitted
- Documentation requested
- Ticket closed
- Awaiting reply
đź“Ś Final Thought
If violations are issued based on incorrect information—and requests for clarification remain unresolved—it’s important that the process is reviewed and clarified.
Transparency benefits everyone.
